Is there an appropriate balance between the right to protect your Essay

Is there an appropriate balance between the right to protect your reputation with the law of hatchet job and the right to free speech - Essay ExampleObviously democratic societies benefit from free and establish speech as well as providing compensation for those who are injured by false change statements. However, the law of defamation allows for remarkable restriction of the freedom to speak and write.1 This point is amply substantiated by the evaluating the law of defamation and the right to free speech with particular emphasis on how the courts have defend the reputation of the individualThe English law of defamation is decidedly complicated.2 The complexities stem from a variety of practiced and detailed rules contained in both common law principles and legislative provisions.3 Moreover, the common law has been modified by the Defamation Act 1952 and the Defamation Act 1996 and by the European Convention on Human Rights and organic Freedoms which have been indorsed by the Hu man Rights Act 1998.4Under English law defamation can be founded by virtue of either vilify or slander.5 Libel typically refers to the print form although libel does not necessarily require that it was committed by word.6 For instance in Monson v Tussauds Ltd a prove effigy was held to be sufficient to substantiate a libel.7 Ultimately, the libel is required to be such that it makes long-lasting imputations against the character of another8. Common forms of libel are usuall published by television broadcasts, newspapers, video and audio recordings.9Slander, however can be made by virtue of non-permanent forms and is typically committed by word of mouth. A claim in slander requires that the plaintiff prove special damages unless the alleged slander is founded on one of the following groundsBe that as it may, the plaintiff is at license to lodge a complaint with the court and the defendant is required to prove that the statement is true.12 The fact that the plaintiff is at libert y to lodge a complaint so easily, speaks to the strict protection of individual reputations under